1982 Audi UR vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi UR would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi UR. (270 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi UR.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi UR | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Audi | Jeep |
| Model | UR | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 72 L |
