1982 Audi UR vs. 2005 Xedos 9
To start off, 2005 Xedos 9 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Xedos 9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2005 Xedos 9. (161 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2005 Xedos 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Xedos 9 weights approximately 283 kg more than 1982 Audi UR.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi UR (270 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Xedos 9. (212 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1982 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Xedos 9.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi UR | 2005 Xedos 9 | |
| Make | Audi | Xedos |
| Model | UR | 9 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 212 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2760 mm |
