1982 Audi UR vs. 2008 Isuzu I-290
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-290 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Isuzu I-290 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2008 Isuzu I-290. (185 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2008 Isuzu I-290.
Because 1982 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Isuzu I-290. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi UR (270 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu I-290. (258 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1982 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu I-290.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi UR | 2008 Isuzu I-290 | |
Make | Audi | Isuzu |
Model | UR | I-290 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 258 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 74 L |