1982 Audi UR vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi UR would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1982 Audi UR. (197 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi UR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 454 kg more than 1982 Audi UR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi UR. (270 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi UR.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi UR | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | UR | CTS |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1756 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 68 L |