1982 Audi UR vs. 2011 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi UR would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Camaro (426 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1982 Audi UR. (197 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi UR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 565 kg more than 1982 Audi UR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Camaro (569 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi UR. (270 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi UR.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi UR | 2011 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | UR | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 426 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 569 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1867 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4836 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1918 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1389 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2852 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 72 L |
