1982 Audi UR vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi UR would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S60 (296 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1982 Audi UR. (197 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi UR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo S60 weights approximately 431 kg more than 1982 Audi UR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo S60 (441 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi UR. (270 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi UR.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi UR | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Audi | Volvo |
| Model | UR | S60 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1733 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2097 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1484 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2776 mm |
