1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1952 DKW F 91
To start off, 1982 Austin Allegro is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 91. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 91 would be higher. At 998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Austin Allegro (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 91. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 91. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 DKW F 91 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Austin Allegro (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 DKW F 91. (63 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1982 Austin Allegro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 DKW F 91.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 1952 DKW F 91 | |
Make | Austin | DKW |
Model | Allegro | F 91 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 894 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2360 mm |