1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1953 Buick 40
To start off, 1982 Austin Allegro is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,315 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Buick 40 weights approximately 815 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 1953 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Allegro | 1953 Buick 40 | |
| Make | Austin | Buick |
| Model | Allegro | 40 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 4315 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1665 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3090 mm |
