1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1953 Jaguar C-Type
To start off, 1982 Austin Allegro is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,440 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Jaguar C-Type weights approximately 165 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 1953 Jaguar C-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Jaguar C-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Allegro | 1953 Jaguar C-Type | |
| Make | Austin | Jaguar |
| Model | Allegro | C-Type |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3440 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2450 mm |
