1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1956 Cadillac 6239D
To start off, 1982 Austin Allegro is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Cadillac 6239D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Cadillac 6239D would be higher. At 5,972 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Cadillac 6239D is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Cadillac 6239D weights approximately 1160 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 1956 Cadillac 6239D is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Cadillac 6239D. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1956 Cadillac 6239D has automatic transmission and 1982 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1982 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1956 Cadillac 6239D will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 1956 Cadillac 6239D | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Allegro | 6239D |
Year Released | 1982 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 5972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 285 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 2010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3280 mm |