1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1957 Riley 2.6
To start off, 1982 Austin Allegro is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Riley 2.6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Riley 2.6 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Riley 2.6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Riley 2.6 weights approximately 790 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 1957 Riley 2.6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Riley 2.6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Allegro | 1957 Riley 2.6 | |
| Make | Austin | Riley |
| Model | Allegro | 2.6 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2639 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 101 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2890 mm |
