1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1960 Austin A 40
To start off, 1982 Austin Allegro is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Austin Allegro weights approximately 90 kg more than 1960 Austin A 40.
Because 1960 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 1960 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Austin | Austin |
Model | Allegro | A 40 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2130 mm |