1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1962 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1982 Austin Allegro is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Austin Allegro weights approximately 185 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1962 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 1962 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Austin | DAF |
Model | Allegro | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1982 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 26 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2060 mm |