1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 1982 Austin Allegro is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Austin Allegro (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 310 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Allegro | 1963 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Austin | DKW |
| Model | Allegro | Munga |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 74 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2010 mm |
