1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1963 Singer Vogue II
To start off, 1982 Austin Allegro is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Singer Vogue II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Singer Vogue II would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Singer Vogue II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Singer Vogue II weights approximately 242 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 1963 Singer Vogue II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Singer Vogue II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 1963 Singer Vogue II | |
Make | Austin | Singer |
Model | Allegro | Vogue II |
Year Released | 1982 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 57 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1092 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2570 mm |