1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice
To start off, 1982 Austin Allegro is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 820 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Allegro | Caprice |
Year Released | 1982 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 6476 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 275 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3030 mm |