1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1966 Bizzarrini A3C
To start off, 1982 Austin Allegro is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Bizzarrini A3C weights approximately 410 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 1966 Bizzarrini A3C | |
Make | Austin | Bizzarrini |
Model | Allegro | A3C |
Year Released | 1982 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 5353 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 361 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2460 mm |