1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1969 Jaguar 240

To start off, 1982 Austin Allegro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Jaguar 240 (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1982 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 640 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Jaguar 240 (198 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1969 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Allegro.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Austin Allegro 1969 Jaguar 240
Make Austin Jaguar
Model Allegro 240
Year Released 1982 1969
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 998 cc 2483 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 44 HP 131 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 5550 RPM
Torque 70 Nm 198 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3700 RPM
Engine Bore Size 64.6 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.2 mm 76.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 8.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 800 kg 1440 kg
Vehicle Length 3200 mm 4600 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2740 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]