1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1969 Jaguar 240
To start off, 1982 Austin Allegro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Jaguar 240 (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1982 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 640 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Jaguar 240 (198 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1969 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 1969 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | Austin | Jaguar |
Model | Allegro | 240 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2740 mm |