1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1970 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1982 Austin Allegro is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1346 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 1970 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 1970 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Allegro | Sixty |
Year Released | 1982 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 228 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 2196 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3390 mm |