1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1974 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1982 Austin Allegro is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Brougham (193 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1982 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1530 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 1974 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Allegro | Brougham |
Year Released | 1982 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 7732 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 2330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 5950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3390 mm |