1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1978 Lada 1200
To start off, 1982 Austin Allegro is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Lada 1200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Lada 1200 (59 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1982 Austin Allegro. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Lada 1200 should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Lada 1200 weights approximately 145 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Lada 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Lada 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Lada 1200 (85 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1978 Lada 1200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 1978 Lada 1200 | |
Make | Austin | Lada |
Model | Allegro | 1200 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 70 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2430 mm |