1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1982 Austin Allegro is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Nissan Bluebird (59 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1982 Austin Allegro. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 390 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Nissan Bluebird (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Allegro | 1980 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | Allegro | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 1951 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 70 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2530 mm |
