1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1980 Seat 127
To start off, 1982 Austin Allegro is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat 127 would be higher. At 998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Seat 127 (47 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1982 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Seat 127 should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Austin Allegro weights approximately 95 kg more than 1980 Seat 127.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Austin Allegro (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat 127. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Austin Allegro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 1980 Seat 127 | |
Make | Austin | Seat |
Model | Allegro | 127 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 903 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2230 mm |