1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1981 Lada S
To start off, 1982 Austin Allegro is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Lada S would be higher. At 1,293 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Lada S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Lada S weights approximately 200 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 1981 Lada S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Lada S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 1981 Lada S | |
Make | Austin | Lada |
Model | Allegro | S |
Year Released | 1982 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2470 mm |