1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1989 Alpina B 10
To start off, 1989 Alpina B 10 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Alpina B 10 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Alpina B 10 weights approximately 455 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 1989 Alpina B 10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Alpina B 10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Alpina B 10 (705 Nm) has 635 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm). This means 1989 Alpina B 10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 1989 Alpina B 10 | |
Make | Austin | Alpina |
Model | Allegro | B 10 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 705 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1255 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2690 mm |