1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1989 Holden Commodore
To start off, 1989 Holden Commodore is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Holden Commodore weights approximately 460 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 1989 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 1989 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | Allegro | Commodore |
Year Released | 1982 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2740 mm |