1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1996 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1982 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 790 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Allegro | 1996 Daewoo Arcadia | |
| Make | Austin | Daewoo |
| Model | Allegro | Arcadia |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 3206 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4960 mm |
