1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2000 GMC Safari
To start off, 2000 GMC Safari is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 1105 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 2000 GMC Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 GMC Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 GMC Safari has automatic transmission and 1982 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1982 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 GMC Safari will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Allegro | 2000 GMC Safari | |
| Make | Austin | GMC |
| Model | Allegro | Safari |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2830 mm |
