1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2001 Kia Retona
To start off, 2001 Kia Retona is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Kia Retona is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Kia Retona weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 2001 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Allegro | 2001 Kia Retona | |
| Make | Austin | Kia |
| Model | Allegro | Retona |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1870 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2370 mm |
