1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2002 Ford Puma
To start off, 2002 Ford Puma is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Puma weights approximately 185 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 2002 Ford Puma | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Allegro | Puma |
Year Released | 1982 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2450 mm |