1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 5,325 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche weights approximately 1330 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche has automatic transmission and 1982 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1982 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 2003 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Allegro | Avalanche |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 5325 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3310 mm |