1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2003 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2003 Mazda Tribute is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Tribute (122 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1982 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 695 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda Tribute (230 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 2003 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | Allegro | Tribute |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1495 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2500 mm |