1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2003 Pontiac GTO

To start off, 2003 Pontiac GTO is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Pontiac GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pontiac GTO (350 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 306 more horse power than 1982 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pontiac GTO should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Pontiac GTO weights approximately 890 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Pontiac GTO is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Pontiac GTO. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Pontiac GTO (495 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 425 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Pontiac GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Allegro.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Austin Allegro 2003 Pontiac GTO
Make Austin Pontiac
Model Allegro GTO
Year Released 1982 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 998 cc 5664 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 44 HP 350 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 70 Nm 495 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 64.6 mm 99 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.2 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 10.1:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 800 kg 1690 kg
Vehicle Length 3200 mm 4830 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2750 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]