1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2005 BMW 316
To start off, 2005 BMW 316 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW 316 weights approximately 525 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 2005 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 BMW 316 has automatic transmission and 1982 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1982 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 BMW 316 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 2005 BMW 316 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | Allegro | 316 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 113 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2730 mm |