1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (340 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 296 more horse power than 1982 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 710 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (420 Nm) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 2005 Chrysler Crossfire | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | Allegro | Crossfire |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 3195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 340 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 420 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2410 mm |