1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2005 MCC Smart
To start off, 2005 MCC Smart is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Austin Allegro weights approximately 120 kg more than 2005 MCC Smart.
Because 2005 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 2005 MCC Smart | |
Make | Austin | MCC |
Model | Allegro | Smart |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2370 mm |