1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero (128 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1982 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 631 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero (190 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | Allegro | Pajero |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 81.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 95.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1431 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2290 mm |