1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2007 Panoz Esperante
To start off, 2007 Panoz Esperante is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Panoz Esperante is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2007 Panoz Esperante is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Panoz Esperante. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 2007 Panoz Esperante | |
Make | Austin | Panoz |
Model | Allegro | Esperante |
Year Released | 1982 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 4589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2700 mm |