1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2009 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XK is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XK weights approximately 935 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 2009 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 1982 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1982 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 2009 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Austin | Jaguar |
Model | Allegro | XK |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 410 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2760 mm |