1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1982 Austin Allegro. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 155 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (145 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | Allegro | 6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 70 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2610 mm |