1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2010 Acura RDX
To start off, 2010 Acura RDX is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Acura RDX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Acura RDX weights approximately 933 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 2010 Acura RDX is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Acura RDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Acura RDX has automatic transmission and 1982 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1982 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Acura RDX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 2010 Acura RDX | |
Make | Austin | Acura |
Model | Allegro | RDX |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1783 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4636 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1869 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1654 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2649 mm |