1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2011 Citroen C1
To start off, 2011 Citroen C1 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. Both 1982 Austin Allegro and 2011 Citroen C1 are equipped with a 998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Citroen C1 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1982 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C1 should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C1 (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Citroen C1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Allegro | 2011 Citroen C1 | |
| Make | Austin | Citroen |
| Model | Allegro | C1 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 70 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2350 mm |
