1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2011 Koenigsegg Agera
To start off, 2011 Koenigsegg Agera is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Koenigsegg Agera is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Koenigsegg Agera weights approximately 440 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 2011 Koenigsegg Agera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Koenigsegg Agera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 2011 Koenigsegg Agera | |
Make | Austin | Koenigsegg |
Model | Allegro | Agera |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 1100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Biofuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2660 mm |