1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2013 BMW M5
To start off, 2013 BMW M5 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 4,395 cc (10 cylinders), 2013 BMW M5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW M5 weights approximately 970 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 2013 BMW M5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 BMW M5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Allegro | 2013 BMW M5 | |
| Make | Austin | BMW |
| Model | Allegro | M5 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 4395 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 493 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4863 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1846 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1469 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2889 mm |
