1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 658 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Austin | Mini |
Model | Allegro | Countryman |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2595 mm |