1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2013 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2013 Nissan Armada is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1802 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 2013 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Nissan Armada has automatic transmission and 1982 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1982 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Nissan Armada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Allegro | 2013 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | Allegro | Armada |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 5600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 313 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 2652 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5276 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2014 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1981 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3130 mm |
