1982 Austin Ambassador vs. 1978 Renault Alpine
To start off, 1982 Austin Ambassador is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Renault Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Renault Alpine would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Renault Alpine is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Renault Alpine (148 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Renault Alpine should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Ambassador.
Because 1978 Renault Alpine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Renault Alpine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Ambassador, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Renault Alpine (204 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (131 Nm). This means 1978 Renault Alpine will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Ambassador.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Ambassador | 1978 Renault Alpine | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | Ambassador | Alpine |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1698 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 131 Nm | 204 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
