1982 Austin Ambassador vs. 2000 Lada 110
To start off, 2000 Lada 110 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Ambassador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Ambassador would be higher. At 1,698 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Austin Ambassador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lada 110 (93 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (83 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lada 110 should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Ambassador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Austin Ambassador weights approximately 185 kg more than 2000 Lada 110.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Austin Ambassador (131 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada 110. (128 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1982 Austin Ambassador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Ambassador | 2000 Lada 110 | |
| Make | Austin | Lada |
| Model | Ambassador | 110 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1698 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 131 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2500 mm |
