1982 Austin Ambassador vs. 2005 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2005 Fiat Croma is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Ambassador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Ambassador would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Fiat Croma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Fiat Croma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Ambassador, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Ambassador | 2005 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | Ambassador | Croma |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1698 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2840 mm |