1982 Austin Ambassador vs. 2005 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2005 Opel Meriva is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Ambassador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Ambassador would be higher. At 1,698 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Austin Ambassador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Opel Meriva (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (83 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Opel Meriva should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Ambassador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Opel Meriva weights approximately 1 kg more than 1982 Austin Ambassador. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Opel Meriva (165 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (131 Nm). This means 2005 Opel Meriva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Ambassador.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Ambassador | 2005 Opel Meriva | |
Make | Austin | Opel |
Model | Ambassador | Meriva |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1698 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 165 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2740 mm |